On April 10, 1925, a novel quietly arrived on bookstore shelves. Its author, F. Scott Fitzgerald, was known to a literary crowd but had yet to cement his place in the canon. The book—The Great Gatsby—was modestly received, selling just 20,000 copies in its first year.

Today, a full century later, it stands not just as a pillar of American literature but as a cultural mirror. Its centennial invites reflection—not only on the life of its characters and its author but on the very dream it dared to dissect.

In 1925, readers met Jay Gatsby, a man whose mansion overflowed with champagne and strangers, but whose soul was consumed by a green light. They met Daisy Buchanan, beautiful and elusive, perched upon wealth inherited rather than earned. They met Nick Carraway, a witness rather than a participant, whose quiet observations exposed the rot beneath the glitter. And though the Roaring Twenties are long gone, The Great Gatsby feels urgently relevant in 2025, particularly when you pause and utter a line with wry resignation: “Imagine being able to afford two eggs.”

From the Jazz Age to Inflation Age

The line—“Imagine being able to afford two eggs”—isn’t from Fitzgerald, of course. It’s a contemporary expression of disbelief over rising grocery prices. But in its sarcasm lies a poetic collision between 1925 and 2025. When The Great Gatsby was published, eggs cost about 47 cents a dozen—a trivial expense for both the working class and the elite. A century later, amid inflation spikes, supply chain disruptions, and wage stagnation, a dozen eggs might cost $6 or more, depending on your city and store.

It’s a small example, but it crystallizes the economic anxiety of our time. Just as Gatsby’s glittering parties masked his loneliness and criminal dealings, today’s appearances of prosperity—tech billionaires, viral luxury unboxings, Instagram dreamscapes—often obscure growing inequality and systemic instability.

In both eras, opulence exists. But it’s increasingly concentrated in fewer hands. And for the rest of us, the dream has grown not only distant but absurd: Imagine being able to afford two eggs. It’s no longer just about not reaching the green light. It’s about realizing the dock may have been built for someone else entirely.

Gatsby’s Dream and Ours: Shifting Symbols

Jay Gatsby’s life is a riddle wrapped in gold. He throws parties for people who don’t know him, builds wealth to win a woman who never waits for him, and reinvents himself only to be undone by the past. His story is a fable about aspiration in a society that rewards appearances more than substance.

The American Dream—often distilled as the idea that hard work leads to success—sits at the heart of Gatsby’s story. But Fitzgerald saw through the illusion. Gatsby builds a fortune, but he remains outside the circle of old money. No matter how vast his resources, he’s never quite legitimate. The dream, he discovers, is rigged. And perhaps, always has been.

In 2025, the dream is just as slippery. Millennials and Gen Z, the inheritors of today’s America, face a reality shaped by student debt, housing crises, climate disasters, and job precarity. Upward mobility—the dream’s cornerstone—is no longer assumed. It’s negotiated, delayed, and too often, denied.

Gatsby’s yearning for Daisy isn’t just romantic; it’s existential. She represents arrival, belonging, acceptance. Today, many of us chase different versions of Daisy: home ownership, debt freedom, work-life balance. But like Gatsby, we often find that no amount of effort guarantees the dream. The light glows, the current resists, and the dream recedes.

The Myth of Reinvention

One of the most enduring aspects of Gatsby’s character is his self-invention. Born James Gatz in North Dakota, he transforms himself into Jay Gatsby through sheer will, luck, and myth-making. He doesn’t just climb the social ladder—he builds his own mansion at the top.

This idea of reinvention has always been central to American identity. Immigrants, entrepreneurs, artists—all are encouraged to start anew, to change their names, change their lives, to be reborn in the land of opportunity. Fitzgerald, ever the realist, exposes the cracks in this narrative. Gatsby reinvents himself, yes, but the past remains, and it doesn’t forgive.

In our time, reinvention is still preached—from influencer rebrands to tech startup pivots. But the barriers remain. Systemic racism, economic redlining, lack of healthcare, and algorithmic bias all conspire to limit who gets to reinvent and who remains invisible. Just as Gatsby was haunted by his roots and snubbed by East Egg’s elite, many today feel the constraints of origin—bound not by imagination, but by access.

The tragedy isn’t just that Gatsby dies. It’s that his death is barely noticed by the very people who once bathed in his hospitality. It’s a brutal reminder: in a society where reinvention is conditional, erasure is always possible.

IV. The Women of Gatsby, Then and Now

Daisy Buchanan is often dismissed as shallow or careless, the “beautiful little fool” she cynically wishes her daughter to become. Yet Daisy, like Gatsby, is a victim of her time. Her power lies in beauty and social standing, not autonomy. Trapped in a loveless marriage, she chooses comfort over chaos, inheritance over hope.

Today’s women navigate a different world—one shaped by feminism, labor rights, reproductive battles, and digital visibility. But the pressure to perform beauty, charm, and restraint persists. The Daisys of 2025 may be CEOs or creatives, but they still exist in a world that values their image as much as their intellect.

Jordan Baker, the novel’s other key female character, is a professional golfer—a modern woman in many ways. Yet her character, too, is undermined by a suggestion of dishonesty, as if ambition in a woman necessarily signals moral compromise. One hundred years later, this double standard hasn’t vanished. Women in power remain under harsher scrutiny, expected to be exceptional and likable, flawless yet humble.

In rereading The Great Gatsby, we see how Fitzgerald sketched the early blueprints of gender expectation. And in reflecting on today’s social dynamics, we recognize how persistent those expectations remain.

Class, Consumption, and the Modern Gaze

One of Fitzgerald’s sharpest tools is his critique of class. The Great Gatsby is often taught as a glamorous tale, but its opulence is undercut by moral rot. The Buchanans destroy lives and escape consequences. Gatsby, despite his wealth, dies isolated. Myrtle, poor and desperate, is collateral damage.

Class, in Gatsby’s world, is not just about money—it’s about lineage, taste, and immunity. That’s why Gatsby will never be “one of them.” It’s why Nick retreats back to the Midwest, disillusioned by the East’s gilded emptiness.

In 2025, class markers have evolved. Instead of old-money estates, we have blue checks, tech wealth, and curated lifestyles. But the divisions are just as stark. Consumption remains the language of aspiration—designer brands, luxury travel, NFT art, minimalist apartments. Social media amplifies the illusion of access, even as it widens the gap between those who perform wealth and those who live it.

Today, visibility is currency. But like Gatsby’s parties, it often masks emptiness. Followers can’t substitute for friendships. Virality doesn’t guarantee stability. And just as Gatsby’s guests disappeared once the champagne stopped flowing, so too can online audiences vanish with the next algorithm change.

The Loneliness of the Modern Dreamer

Perhaps the most heartbreaking aspect of Gatsby’s story is its loneliness. He builds a palace but lives like a ghost, waiting for Daisy. When he dies, almost no one comes to his funeral. His myth vanishes like mist, leaving behind a mansion and a whisper.

This sense of isolation resonates profoundly today. In an age of hyperconnectivity, loneliness is epidemic. We scroll past each other’s lives, measuring ourselves against curated versions of happiness and success. We build digital mansions—profiles, feeds, followings—but often struggle to find meaning behind the curtain.

Gatsby’s loneliness wasn’t just personal—it was structural. He existed at the edge of a world that never truly accepted him. Many today—immigrants, gig workers, displaced communities—know this feeling intimately. The structures promise belonging but deliver distance.

The Green Light: Then, Now, Forever

The green light at the end of Daisy’s dock remains one of literature’s most enduring symbols. It stands for hope, ambition, the dream deferred but never relinquished. For Gatsby, it is the future he believes is just within reach. For Nick—and for us—it becomes a haunting reminder of our collective striving and our collective delusion.

In 2025, what is our green light? A fairer world? A return to pre-pandemic normalcy? Stability amid climate uncertainty? For some, it’s homeownership. For others, it’s healthcare. For many, it’s just enough.

The green light endures because the dream endures. But the dream, like the light, is often distorted by fog—of politics, inequality, fear. We move toward it, but we never quite arrive. As Fitzgerald wrote: “So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.”

A Century Later: Reading Gatsby in 2025

To read The Great Gatsby in its centennial year is to engage in time travel. It’s a portal into the anxieties of 1925—post-war excess, cultural shifts, technological change—and a mirror for 2025’s own questions. Are we free to dream? Can wealth buy happiness? Who gets to start over?

Fitzgerald didn’t give us answers. He gave us parables wrapped in prose so crystalline that it still cuts. He didn’t write The Great Gatsby to be loved by the world. He wrote it to understand it. And now, 100 years later, we read it not just to admire the sentences, but to hear the echoes.

 

No comments yet.