review adidas Superstar Recap: A Campaign That Refuses the Clock
April 2, 2026
2 hours ago
There are campaigns that sell product, and then there are campaigns that attempt something more elusive: to reposition a cultural object not as a trend, but as a constant. With “Superstars,” adidas Originals leans decisively toward the latter, constructing a narrative that resists chronology altogether. The premise is deceptively simple—a hotel, a cast, a shoe—but the execution suggests something closer to a meditation on permanence.
The Superstar, first introduced in 1969, has long since moved beyond its origins as a basketball shoe. Its shell toe, once a technical solution, has become a semiotic device—instantly legible across continents, generations, and subcultures. What “Superstars” proposes is not a reinvention, but a reframing: the shoe as an anchor point within a constantly shifting cultural interior.
View this post on Instagram
stir
The campaign’s central device, the “Hotel Superstar,” functions less as a setting and more as a conceptual architecture. Corridors stretch without clear beginning or end. Rooms appear as discrete worlds, each occupied by a figure whose cultural relevance exists on its own frequency.
Samuel L. Jackson serves as both narrator and guide, his presence grounding the otherwise fluid temporality. There is a deliberate restraint in his movement—measured, observational—suggesting not a protagonist, but a witness. He does not disrupt the rooms he enters; he acknowledges them.
Within these spaces, figures like JENNIE and Kendall Jenner exist not as endorsers, but as occupants. Their styling—monochromatic, minimal, occasionally interrupted by sharp red accents—echoes the visual grammar of the Superstar itself. Nothing feels excessive. Nothing feels dated.
The decision to cast across disciplines is not incidental. James Harden brings the silhouette back toward its athletic lineage, while Lamine Yamal gestures toward a future still in formation. Together, they construct a spectrum rather than a hierarchy.
flow
Directed by Thibaut Grevet, the campaign avoids the hyper-saturated polish that often defines contemporary brand films. Instead, it leans into texture—grain, background, stillness. The black-and-white portraiture and sepia-toned full-body compositions suggest a deliberate removal of temporal markers.
This is not nostalgia. It is something quieter: a refusal to be pinned to a single moment.
Grevet’s camera lingers just long enough to allow each subject’s individuality to surface without collapsing into performance. A glance held slightly too long. A posture that resists symmetry. Even the more animated gestures—like Jenner’s exaggerated expression—feel less like spectacle and more like punctuation.
consider
If the Superstar is the anchor, the apparel becomes the atmosphere. The campaign extends beyond footwear into a wardrobe that feels simultaneously archival and contemporary.
The tracksuit—arguably as iconic as the shoe itself—returns with subtle recalibrations. Stripes remain intact, but proportions loosen. Silhouettes soften. There is an ease that suggests movement without urgency.
Denim enters not as a statement, but as a continuation. Crochet, unexpectedly, introduces texture without disrupting cohesion. Each element feels considered, yet unforced—as though it has always belonged within this ecosystem.
The palette remains disciplined: black, white, and controlled interruptions of red. It is a language that communicates instantly, requiring no translation.
View this post on Instagram
navigate
The inclusion of figures like JENNIE and Jenner reflects a broader shift in how influence is mapped. No longer confined to a single geography or discipline, cultural authority now exists in overlapping networks.
JENNIE’s presence, in particular, underscores the permeability between music, fashion, and global identity. Her alignment with adidas Originals feels less like a partnership and more like a convergence of parallel narratives.
Jenner, meanwhile, operates within a different register—one that merges editorial fashion with mass visibility. Her portrayal within the campaign leans into controlled disruption: composed, yet deliberately exaggerated in moments.
Harden and Yamal introduce a kinetic counterpoint. Even in stillness, there is an implied motion—a reminder that the Superstar’s origins remain embedded in performance.
influ
At the center of all this remains the Superstar itself. Its design has changed remarkably little over decades, and that constancy is precisely what allows it to function as a cultural throughline.
The black-and-white iterations presented here feel less like new releases and more like reaffirmations. Red accents—subtle, strategic—introduce just enough variation to signal evolution without suggesting departure.
There is a discipline in this approach that stands in contrast to the industry’s broader tendency toward constant reinvention. adidas Originals is not attempting to outpace the cycle; it is stepping outside of it.
cont
Positioned around March 2026 and extending into early April, the campaign aligns with a transitional moment in the fashion calendar. It arrives just as the industry shifts from runway abstraction to retail reality.
What “Superstars” accomplishes is a bridging of those phases. It carries the conceptual weight of a show or exhibition, yet remains grounded in product that is immediately accessible.
This duality—conceptual yet wearable, archival yet current—defines the campaign’s broader significance.
fwd
Perhaps the most striking aspect of “Superstars” is what it chooses not to do. There is no overt attempt to redefine the brand. No aggressive push toward novelty.
Instead, the campaign operates through accumulation—of images, of identities, of subtle gestures. It trusts that the weight of its history, combined with the specificity of its casting, is enough.
In an industry often driven by acceleration, this restraint reads as confidence.
clue
As Samuel L. Jackson moves through the final corridor of the Hotel Superstar, the campaign resists resolution. There is no definitive ending, no singular takeaway.
And that is precisely the point.
The Superstar does not belong to a moment. It belongs to a continuum—one that “Superstars” captures not by compressing time, but by allowing it to dissolve.
