The “Jurassic” franchise has become something of a cinematic fossil bed — an ever-churning, lucrative excavation of ancient ideas, resurrected time and again for new generations. Gareth Edwards’ Jurassic World: Rebirth arrives not merely as another sequel, but as a perplexing new branch on an evolutionary tree already weighed down by narrative mutations and corporate tinkering. This film seems to understand its own redundancy and yet marches forward, echoing the unstoppable instincts of the very dinosaurs it portrays.

A Franchise Born from Literary Roots

The original Jurassic Park was born from Michael Crichton’s 1990 techno-thriller novel, which captured the zeitgeist of genetic engineering fears and scientific hubris. Steven Spielberg’s 1993 adaptation elevated the material into a cultural juggernaut, merging awe and terror through pioneering visual effects and John Williams’ soaring score. It was less a monster movie than a meditation on human overreach — a concept personified by Dr. Ian Malcolm’s (Jeff Goldblum) legendary line: “Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should.”

This core theme became diluted in subsequent sequels, as each installment increasingly favored larger dinosaurs and louder explosions over nuanced commentary. By the time the Jurassic World trilogy launched in 2015, the franchise had fully embraced blockbuster maximalism, favoring genetically hybridized creatures like the Indominus Rex and Indoraptor over philosophical reflection.

Enter “Distortus Rex”

Jurassic World: Rebirth introduces a new abomination: the “Distortus Rex,” a bioengineered chimera that seems to parody the franchise’s own spiral into absurdity. The creature is equal parts grotesque and mesmerizing, a literal manifestation of humanity’s inability to let go of a bad idea if it still sells tickets and merchandise.

Edwards, known for his atmospheric approach in films like Godzilla (2014) and Rogue One, attempts to return to the original film’s sense of wonder and fear. There are moments of genuine suspense as the Distortus Rex stalks its prey through neon-lit jungle enclosures, invoking a primal dread. But these flashes are darkened by the weight of a bloated franchise that no longer seems capable of genuine reinvention.

Hollywood’s Endless Appetite

The continuous revival of Jurassic films mirrors Hollywood’s broader trend of nostalgia mining. In an industry dominated by streaming wars and franchise fatigue, recognizable IPs provide a safety net for risk-averse studios. Jurassic World: Rebirth is emblematic of this pattern — a reboot masquerading as a fresh narrative experiment.

Yet, there’s a particular irony in a series centered on extinct creatures refusing to die itself. Audiences have shown that they still crave these dinosaurs, either it’s for the childlike wonder they inspire or the comforting familiarity of returning to Isla Nublar (or whatever island or mainland facility is under siege this time). The tension between audience demand and creative staleness encapsulates the paradox of modern franchise filmmaking.

Nostalgia vs. Innovation

Edwards’ film attempts to straddle both nostalgia and innovation, a balancing act that rarely succeeds. The opening act teases a stripped-down survival horror vibe, with scientists and mercenaries hunted through moonlit foliage. There are quiet scenes reminiscent of Spielberg’s 1993 classic, where the silhouette of a towering predator is more terrifying than CGI bombast.

However, this restraint is quickly abandoned in favor of an explosive final act featuring motorcycle chases, military drones, and genetically engineered apex predators tearing through a futuristic research compound. The film seems desperate to please every possible demographic: horror fans, action enthusiasts, children enthralled by dinosaurs, and toy manufacturers eager to sell Distortus Rex figurines.

The Ghosts of Sequels Past

Looking back, the original Jurassic Park trilogy gradually devolved from thematic cautionary tale to creature feature. The Lost World (1997) attempted to expand on ethical questions but fell into standard monster movie tropes. Jurassic Park III(2001) was openly mercenary in its approach, serving up cheap thrills with minimal narrative glue.

The Jurassic World trilogy doubled down on this approach. The first film reimagined the park as a corporate theme park nightmare, ironically mirroring the franchise’s own commodification. Fallen Kingdom (2018) brought dinosaurs to the mainland in a plot that blurred gothic horror and action spectacle. By Dominion (2022), the narrative threads had frayed entirely, culminating in a chaotic, globe-trotting mishmash that barely acknowledged its own scientific or ethical foundations.

Rebirth attempts to correct this trajectory by distancing itself from those convoluted plotlines. In theory, it’s a standalone film meant to “reset” the franchise. In practice, it feels like a soft reboot that still carries the same creative baggage.

Gareth Edwards’ Vision (or Lack Thereof)

Edwards is undeniably skilled at evoking scale and tension, but his authorship here is diluted by studio oversight. Rebirthis filled with his trademark slow-burn buildups and atmospheric visuals, yet the final product is patchwork, as if multiple screenwriters and executives tugged at different narrative threads until they unraveled.

In interviews, Edwards described wanting to return to “the awe and terror” of the first film. He partially succeeds in certain set pieces — a rain-soaked sequence with a stealthy Distortus Rex echoes the T. rex breakout from 1993. But too often, the film undercuts these moments with winking self-awareness or tonal whiplash, leaving audiences unsure whether to be thrilled or amused.

Merchandising: The Real Engine

Perhaps the clearest indicator of the franchise’s priorities lies not in its scripts but in its merchandise. The Jurassic films have become vehicles for selling toys, video games, theme park attractions, and branded cereal. Rebirth doubles down on this trend, introducing a menagerie of new creatures that seem designed primarily to fill toy shelves rather than serve any narrative purpose.

This commercialization isn’t unique to Jurassic, of course. From Star Wars to Transformers, blockbuster cinema has long been tied to ancillary markets. But there’s a particular melancholy in watching a franchise that once warned against unchecked corporate hubris become an unabashed example of it.

The Ethical Questions, Ignored

One of the most frustrating aspects of Rebirth is its unwillingness to engage deeply with the ethical implications of genetic engineering. The original film’s power derived from its cautionary tale about man’s desire to control nature, echoing themes from Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein and countless other cautionary myths. Here, ethics are little more than window dressing for the next chase scene.

Characters occasionally gesture at philosophical debates — one scientist delivers a half-hearted speech about “playing God” before being promptly eaten. These moments feel obligatory rather than integral, as though the film is ticking off boxes on a franchise to-do list rather than exploring its potential.

Why We Keep Coming Back

Despite all its flaws, there is something undeniably magnetic about dinosaurs on screen. They represent both our deepest fears and our greatest fascinations: primal predators, lost worlds, the ultimate “what if?” scenario. Each new film promises to rekindle that spark of wonder, to reconnect us with the wide-eyed awe we felt seeing a brachiosaurus lumber across the screen for the first time.

Rebirth flirts with this magic in brief, shining intervals. But like its predecessors, it quickly retreats into the safety of established formulas, as if afraid to stray too far from the comfort of market-tested tropes.

The Future of Jurassic

Where does the franchise go from here? Universal has hinted at expanding the universe into streaming series, spin-offs, and more immersive theme park experiences. The brand’s endurance seems assured, regardless of critical reception. The real question is whether future iterations will dare to genuinely evolve or continue to mutate into increasingly monstrous forms.

Perhaps the best path forward would be to embrace smaller-scale, character-driven stories within this universe — tales that focus on survival, ethics, and the limits of science rather than bombastic spectacle. But given Hollywood’s current trajectory, it seems more likely we’ll get yet another roaring hybrid beast by 2027.

The Dinosaur That Ate Its Own Tail

Jurassic World: Rebirth is, at once, a thrilling ride and a tragic emblem of modern blockbuster filmmaking. It is a film trapped in its own DNA, unable to escape the commercial forces that gave it life. Much like the cloned creatures it depicts, it is a creation that should perhaps not exist, yet fascinates us precisely because it does.

To misquote Ian Malcolm again: Hollywood was so preoccupied with whether it could resurrect the Jurassic franchise, it didn’t stop to think if it should. And yet, we’ll line up to see it, popcorn in hand, because deep down we still long to hear that first rumbling roar, to catch a glimpse of a creature we know shouldn’t be there. That tension — between awe and aversion, creation and consumption — is the paradox that keeps this prehistoric beast alive, no matter how many times it threatens to go extinct.

No comments yet.