As part of Hulu’s 2024 “Huluween” lineup, Mr. Crocket has sparked significant attention with its chilling premise. This horror film, set in 1993, centers on a demonic children’s television host who kidnaps kids and brutally murders their parents, plunging the nostalgic charm of 90s-era TV into something much darker. Directed by Brandon Espy, “Mr. Crocket” takes inspiration from its 2022 short film origins in Hulu’s “Bite Size Halloween” series, and attempts to expand its horrifying concept into a full-length feature. While the film manages to deliver some gruesome thrills, it falters in pacing and narrative, resulting in a horror experience that struggles to maintain its initial intrigue.

The Concept: Nostalgia Meets Horror

The core premise of “Mr. Crocket”—a beloved children’s TV show host turned murderer—taps into a growing subgenre of horror that plays on nostalgia, particularly the unnerving juxtaposition of innocence and horror. Shows like ”Willy’s Wonderland” and “Five Nights at Freddy’s” have successfully exploited childhood fears by recontextualizing seemingly benign settings or characters into something more sinister. “Mr. Crocket” follows a similar formula, taking the familiar concept of a whimsical, friendly children’s host and twisting it into the embodiment of evil. As “Bloody Disgusting”points out, Mr. Crocket’s presence in the film “alternates between charming host and sociopathic murderer,” making him a terrifying blend of Freddy Krueger and Mr. Rogers.

Elvis Nolasco’s portrayal of Mr. Crocket is a standout in this regard. His performance as the demonic host captures the eerie charm of a beloved television personality who masks a darker, sadistic side. His shifts from calm, charismatic TV host to a relentless killer are unsettling, adding a level of unpredictability to the character that keeps the audience on edge. Nolasco’s performance effectively anchors the horror, allowing Mr. Crocket to dominate every scene he’s in, even when the narrative around him falters.

A Mother’s Desperate Quest

The film follows Summer (Jerrika Hinton), whose son is abducted by Mr. Crocket after he emerges from the television set. Summer’s quest to rescue her child forms the emotional core of the movie, and while Hinton delivers a strong performance, the script does little to elevate her role beyond the typical horror trope of the determined mother. The film leans heavily into well-worn clichés: the grieving mother, the misunderstood hero, and the forgotten woman, as “Laughing Place” notes, leaving little room for character development.

Despite the limitations of the script, Hinton manages to inject some emotional depth into her performance. Her portrayal of Summer’s desperation and grief, combined with her determination to confront Mr. Crocket, helps ground the supernatural elements of the story. Summer’s journey also brings in additional characters with ulterior motives, which attempts to add layers to the plot but ultimately feels underdeveloped.

Practical Effects and Visual Design

One of Mr. Crocket’s strongest aspects is its use of practical effects, harkening back to the glory days of physical, hands-on horror. In an era where CGI often overshadows physical effects, “Mr. Crocket” chooses a different route, opting for gruesome, tactile visuals that enhance the film’s visceral horror. From the nightmarish children’s props that take on a life of their own to the creative kills that permeate the film, the practical effects help deliver some of the film’s most memorable moments.

As “Laughing Place” highlights, the film’s “demonic Pee-Wee’s Playhouse props and characters” are particularly effective in creating a surreal, unsettling atmosphere. This attention to detail extends to the set design, with the brightly colored, 90s-inspired TV set becoming a place of terror once Mr. Crocket begins his murderous spree. The contrast between the vibrant aesthetic of children’s programming and the bloody violence that follows makes for some striking visual moments.

Pacing Issues and Over-Explained Narrative

While Mr. Crocket excels in its visual design and concept, the film suffers from pacing issues that prevent it from fully realizing its potential. At 90 minutes, the film feels stretched thin, with too many expository scenes that bog down the momentum. Much of the dialogue is used to over-explain the plot, leaving little to the imagination. As one critic puts it, the film needed to “show, not tell,” as it becomes weighed down by unnecessary details rather than focusing on the tension and horror at its core.

These pacing issues are perhaps a result of the film’s transition from a short feature to a full-length movie. While the original short likely benefited from the concise nature of the format, allowing for a more focused narrative, the expansion into a 90-minute film leaves room for filler and redundant storytelling. The initial tension built around Mr. Crocket’s appearance quickly loses its impact as the film drags through lengthy conversations and explanations that feel disconnected from the horror unfolding on-screen.

Impression

Given its origins as part of Hulu’s “Bite Size Halloween”, Mr. Crocket feels like a film that works better in smaller doses. The concept of a murderous children’s show host is ripe for a shorter, more punchy narrative, where the horror can be more immediate and intense. Expanding this idea into a feature-length project brings with it the challenge of sustaining audience interest, and unfortunately, Mr. Crocket struggles with this. The film’s repetitive structure, where scenes of horror are interspersed with drawn-out exposition, detracts from the overall experience, leading to moments where the horror feels diluted.

As “Bloody Disgusting” suggests, Mr. Crocket might have worked better as a segment in an anthology series like “American Horror Stories”  In that format, the film’s eerie premise could have been explored more concisely, allowing for a more focused narrative that doesn’t rely on excessive dialogue to fill time. The concept is strong enough to warrant attention, but the execution in a feature-length format leaves much to be desired.

“Mr. Crocket” is a film that succeeds in its visual horror and concept but falters in its narrative execution. The nostalgic horror subgenre has produced some memorable entries in recent years, and while Mr. Crocket fits comfortably within this space, it lacks the depth and pacing needed to elevate it beyond a standard horror flick. Elvis Nolasco’s performance as the titular villain is the film’s greatest strength, bringing a level of menace and unpredictability that keeps the audience engaged, even when the script does not.

Ultimately, “Mr. Crocket” is a film for horror fans who appreciate practical effects and the unsettling mix of childhood innocence and terror. However, for those looking for a more tightly written and suspenseful experience, the film may feel like a missed opportunity. As part of Hulu’s “Huluween” lineup, it offers some memorable moments, but it’s unlikely to leave a lasting impression beyond its initial viewing.

 

No comments yet.